How often do women falsely cry rape? Since an 18-year-old high school student who admitted lying after telling police that five men had tricked her into a bathroom and then gang raped her two weeks ago, that question has been flying around in my head. From my experience the answers to that question fall into one of two camps. “Many feminists argue that the problem of false accusations is so minuscule that to discuss it extensively is a harmful distraction from the far more serious problem of rape. On the other side are men’s-rights activists, claiming that false accusations are as much of a scourge as rape itself.”

But isn’t the rate of false rape charges an empirical question, with a specific answer that isn’t vulnerable to ideological twisting? Yes and no. There has been a burst of research on this subject. Some of it is careful, but much of it is questionable. While most of the good studies converge at a rate of about 8 percent to 10 percent for false rape charges, the literature isn’t quite definitive enough to stamp out the far higher estimates. And even if we go by the lower numbers, there’s the question of interpretation. If one in 10 charges of rape is made up, is that a dangerously high rate or an acceptably low one? To put this in perspective, if we use the Bureau of Justice Statistics that show about 200,000 (when I saw that, I knew that was some “SVU” propaganda) rapes in 2008, we could be looking at as many as 20,000 false accusations.

When I was younger the police used to be routinely suspicious of rape victims. “Surely the simplest, and perhaps the most important, reason not to permit conviction for rape on the uncorroborated word of the prosecutrix is that the word is very often false,” a Yale Law Journal article opined in 1952, echoing a view voiced since at least the 17th century. These views remained mainstream into the 1970s, if not later. As Marcia Clark said yesterday recalling the 1977 rape charges against Roman Polanski, “Those were the days when folks still believed rape was ‘easy to charge and hard to disprove.’ ” And that old adage couldn’t have been further from the truth. Prosecutors well knew that unless the victim was Snow White, the case was toast.”

I remember when fem bot Susan Brownmiller Wrote her hypocrisy of a book : Against Our Will: Men, Women and Rape,

In her book, Brownmiller said that only 2 percent of rape allegations are false, citing findings by the female police in a New York City rape squad. The problem is that while this statistic has been widely repeated, with dutiful mentions of New York-based “research,” no one has ever tracked down its source. This we learned from a comprehensive review of the literature on false rape charges published in the Cambridge Law Journal in 2006. The author, Philip Rumney, finds a couple of small studies that back up the 2 percent claim but isn’t confident of their methodology.

Rumney’s survey of the terrain is the best we found. He also takes aim at the findings on the other end of the spectrum—the research that purports to show that the rate of false allegations of rape is in the range of 40 percent, as well as the flawed (but often cited) work that makes a crazy high jump to as high as 90 percent. The 40 percent figure is usually attributed to a 1994 article by E.J. Kanin in the Archives of Sexual Behavior. Kanin looked at 109 reports of rape to police in one small Midwestern metropolitan area over nine years. His pool was small. The police he studied always offered the victim a polygraph—perhaps signaling they doubted her veracity. And Kanin himself “warns against generalising from his findings” and points to reasons for questioning them, as Rumney explains.

The hugely high 90 percent false rate is several degrees more suspect. The citation for it is usually a study in Scotland by police surgeon N.M. MacLean of only 34 rape complaints made from 1969-74. Complaints were labeled false if they were made after a delay. Or if the victim didn’t look “disheveled” or upset or seriously injured. But those factors don’t necessarily indicate that a rape charge is trumped up. When police use stereotypes about rape to sort real allegations from false ones, they can do victims a real disservice, as this model paper from the Oregon Attorney General’s Sexual Assault Task Force explains. In a 1981 study of 16 reports that claimed the victim admitted to making it up in 14 of them, one case was disproved because the police decided the woman was too large for the alleged rapist to have taken off her “extremely tight undergarments” against her will. Need we say that this not the critical eye we want from the cops?

Rumney’s smart debunkings leave us with a group of American, British, Canadian, and New Zealand studies that converge around a rate of 8 percent to 10 percent for false reports of rape. Not all of these studies are flawless, but together they’re better than the rest of the lot. They include a massive 1997 report on sexual assault by the U.S. Department of Justice, which includes data from 16,000 local, county, and state law enforcement agencies. The DoJ found that “in 1995, 87% of recorded forcible rapes were completed crimes and the remainder were classified as attempts. Law enforcement agencies indicated that about 8% of forcible rapes reported to them were determined to be unfounded and were excluded from the count of crimes.”

If 8 percent to 10 percent is about right for false reporting of rape, based on what we know so far, how should we think about that number? Rumney says he’s not sure whether crying wolf is more or less likely over rape than over other crimes, because the comparative research is even less conclusive. So that’s a question that appears to have no answer at the moment. (A 2001 Department of Justice report says that the rate of false reports is similar for other crimes, but it also gives the 2 percent figure without a source, so we’re skeptical.)

What is clear, however, are two problems that are the flip side of the same coin. False charges of rape are an absolute nightmare for the men caught in their net. And the specter of made-up allegations is a real problem for law enforcement—which means they are also a problem for women who are telling the truth. Let’s take the men first. Ive heard from many of my own men tell me there own stories. The first one that comes to my mind is one a navy seal told me in Iraq, equal parts heartbreaking and thoughtful:

My girlfriend was raped several years ago. I had been falsely accused of rape less than a year ago. I called her (I had known her before her incident) because I was desperate for someone to talk to who would understand what I was going through. To my great relief, it turned out that we understood each other very well. From the initial stages of suicidal thoughts and not being able to function to the long-term fear, mistrust, and guilt that are facts of our lives, it turns out that her experience of being raped and mine of being falsely accused of rape were very similar. … One important difference, though, is that when she was violated, she received a great deal of help (medical, legal, psychological). Apart from family and friends, I was on my own. My legal and psychological problems had to be dealt with by me at a time when I couldn’t eat, sleep, or think (except, of course, about killing myself).

On the law enforcement end, we heard from Steve Cullen, an Army attorney who’s worked extensively as a prosecutor. He offered this cogent—and dire—explanation of the reverberations when women cry wolf about rape:

False reports have an incredibly corrosive impact on how sexual assault accusations are policed. Police treat sexual assault accusers badly—much worse than the lawyers do—much worse than the courtroom does. Forget what you see on “SVU,” the police end absolutely discourages victims from reporting. Why is this so? Because cops suspect just about every victim is another false accuser, because either he/she has personally dealt with such a problem, or has heard stories from his or her cop buddies to this effect (and yes, in my experience female cops can be even worse offenders). This police behavior is bad, and counterproductive—but it’s real. Putting a real stigma on false reports might combat this a bit—and make it a little easier for actual victims at the police station.
False reports also have a disproportionate impact on juries. How I’d hate to be prosecuting a sexual assault right now. Often in sexual assault prosecutions there’s no debate as to the sex, but everything falls on proving lack of consent—and can only be proven through a convincing and persuasive victim’s testimony. Often, that victim’s testimony has to overcome some less than ideal circumstances—she was drinking, people observed her flirting with the perpetrator etc. That’s something she can own up to, and overcome on her own. What she can’t do on her own is extinguish jury members’ memory of reading of some spectacular false accusation case in the newspaper last month. Every false accusation that makes it into the news makes it that much harder for the real victims to receive justice.

If police and juries are influenced by false reports, especially high-profile instances of false charges, like the Duke lacrosse case or the Hofstra case, why wouldn’t those reports influence victims, too? Up to 60 percent of rapes go unreported. The Hofstra story will only make more women wonder if the police will believe them.
This is sobering. As, of course, is the whole topic. We’re left to draw the following conclusion: False allegations of rape aren’t rampant. But they don’t have to be to cause terrible trouble. This is a problem that a men’s rights movement shouldn’t trump up. And also one that feminists can’t dismiss.


I recently read an article at The Auburn Plainsman by Helen Northcutt ( Fascinating name ) about how Feminism has interfered with classical southern chivalry. Personally, I think today chivalry is both expected but also frowned upon. excerpt:

Chivalry, a long time Southern tradition, has been defined as qualities idealized by knighthood, such as bravery, courtesy, honor and gallantry toward women.

For as long as I can remember, it has always been correct for men to open the door, pick up the tab and mow the lawn.

Even though the feminist movement brought the right to vote and the beginning of equal pay for women, our demands for independence have been shadowed by the fact that we still expect special treatment.

The interpretation of women’s rights has been skewed.

Should we consider our rights and the way we clarify them to be all or nothing? Can we have our cake and it eat, too?

No, Mrs. Northcutter, you may not have your cake and eat it too. For those of you who can’t read in-between the lines she is saying that she wants to act like a butch woman marine and still be treated like a lady. I think not. As I wrote I nodded twice, to reaffirm myself that I am thinking from both sides of my brain.

Yet the misandry continues:

It seems like we are reaping all the benefits, without acknowledging the ideals that significant women of the past like Abigail Adams, Susan B. Anthony, Kate Chopin and many others have labored for.

Not only do we seem confused about how to incorporate these ideals into our lifestyle, but we are confusing the men as well.

They don’t seem to know whether to offer to pay for our dinner or risk insulting us because we think we are independent enough to pay our own way. Don’t get me wrong, having meals paid for and my groceries carried will be sorely missed.

“but we are confusing the men as well.” Confusing the men is a great understatement.

There are very few gentlemen on this planet who can calmly exist while boasting not having gotten the memo on feminism.( Roissy and and General Petraeus are the only ones I know of currently. )

But the rest of the Alpha’s who do not posses super alpha characteristics and everyone lower on the food chain, received and fully understood the memo of feminism. The ‘memo’ can best be described by an argument one of my Lieutenant’s had with his WM girlfriend

Either you get your ass on the bottom or I wont do it anymore

It’s as simple as that. In the face of such debauchery ( that is what feminism is right ), why would men bother to immolate anything remotely like chivalry when a foot up the ass is the likely result.

Im not saying that men dont want to be ‘chivalrous’ to women, but its a question not only does your cunt WM of a girlfriend even what to pampered and protected but does she deserve it.

It’s not like old days in the 80s 50s when chivalry would make things like picking up the bill at dinner and especially standing up for a woman would be common place. If you are caught doing anything like nowadays its either a boot up the ass from her or somebody she knows.( I will touch on that more  in further posts )

An example of the latter would be the whole Kanye West/Taylor Swift thing. Had a person with male genitalia went on stage and stood up for her, they surely would have been scolded by cunt WM actress of hollywood. If not them than it would be the feminist organizations themselves.

So in a way, Ms. Northcutter is right, we will all miss those days in 80s 50s long before male/female relations became a subject of national debate.

And there you have it. The first real post, this blog wont really focus on things like feminism but like the name says “brain food”.

Who the hell am I

I have started this blog because I am tired of dumb people acting dumb. I simply could not put up with watching Jay Leno doing Jay Walking, and asking those idiots “Were is the United states on this map”, I was simply sickened.

After all my years as an officer in the Special Forces I get to come back to the states to see Americans have gotten 600% dumber since 9/11.

This is not to say that I am without my dumb attributes too. I am a straight 37 year old male who likes to listen to Katy Perry and Lady Gaga. I am not perfect, but I am most certainly better than you, and everyone else.

So without further or due, eat your damn brain food.